Anywhere in California : (833) 469-5366

On April 11, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (which includes California) issued another employer friendly decision.  In Samper v. Providence St. Vincent (9th Cir. 10-35811 4/11/12), the limits of an employer’s attendance policy were tested under the Americans with Disabilities Act.  The question asked was

HOW ESSENTIAL IS SHOWING UP FOR WORK ON A PREDICTABLE BASIS?

The answer in the case of a neo-natal intensive care nurse was that attendance really is essential.

In the Sampler case, the employee was a neo-natal intensive care unit nurse.  She sought an accommodation from her employer to allow her an unspecified number of unplanned absences from her job. Specifically, she wanted to opt out of the employer’s attendance policy, which permitted five unplanned absences of unlimited hair loss duration as well as other permitted absences. The court ruled that under the ADA regular attendance was an essential function of this neo-natal nursing position. Click here to read the full decision.

Of course, attendance is not essential to all jobs and employers should use caution and legal counsel in determining what constitutes the essential job functions of a specific position under ADA.

For more information call the experienced trial attorneys at (858) 259-5009 for a free case evaluation.

Disclaimer.  The information provided in this post is for informational and educational purposes only regarding aspects of the topic.  It is intended for California residents only.  This post is considered an advertisement by attorney Richard M. Wirtz and Wirtz Law APC. You should not rely on any of the information provided in this advertisement and no legal advice is given by the advertisement. No attorney client relationship is established by viewing this advertisement. A written signed engagement agreement between you and Wirtz Law APC is required to create an attorney client relationship. You should immediately consult an attorney which is experienced in the topic. Attorney Richard M. Wirtz is responsible for the content of this post.

Pin It on Pinterest