On April 11, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (which includes California) issued another employer friendly decision. In Samper v. Providence St. Vincent (9th Cir. 10-35811 4/11/12), the limits of an employer’s attendance policy were tested under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The question asked was
HOW ESSENTIAL IS SHOWING UP FOR WORK ON A PREDICTABLE BASIS?
The answer in the case of a neo-natal intensive care nurse was that that attendance really is essential.
In the Sampler case, the employee was a neo-natal intensive care unit nurse. She sought an accommodation from her employer to allow her an unspecified number of unplanned absences from her job. Specifically, she wanted to opt out of the employer’s attendance policy, which permitted five unplanned absences of unlimited hair loss duration as well as other permitted absences. The court ruled that under the ADA regular attendance was an essential function of this neo-natal nursing position. Click here to read the full decision.
Of course, attendance is not essential to all jobs and employers should use caution and legal counsel in determining what constitutes the essential job functions of a specific position under ADA.
Thank you for your interest in this article. You should not rely upon it as legal advice. The information contained herein does not create an attorney-client relationship. This article is intended for entertainment and general information purposes only. Laws vary state. Anyone seeking legal advice for a specific situation should consult a qualified lawyer or similar qualified professional in the appropriate state.